Not at all, Tacks. You make some good points, at that.
Firstly, why do people outside of Hanover's field ask him questions? Is there a reason they go to him in particular?
Though it's not very strongly implied as yet, Hanover is a misanthrope. The opening lines are more his own thoughts in that vein than a general narrative. The particular reasons could be any sort of consultation relating to alien plant life, whether it be agriculture on worlds with Earth-like environments or trying to piece together the evolutionary history of alien flora, to address what was explicitly stated. Hanover is strictly a botanist, and so only concerns himself with direct study of properties and such.
Secondly, this sentence doesn't sit well with me.
Again, Hanover is a misanthrope. He'd probably identify anyone he didn't know in the same manner, and he's also not very familiar with the bureaucratic structure of the Coalition of Independent Planets and Planetoids (only said as Coalition or CIPP so far), as he himself is a citizen of what I'll call the Federation for now, since I don't have a good name for it yet.
And yeah, the flow IS a little chunky there now that I look at it. I'll have to remember to reword it whenever I get around to revision.
Fourthly, the point of view seems to flip flop between Hanover and the "government man" at random points in the conversation.
Not really random. Starting from "He noted with unexpressed satisfaction..." we get the G-man's perspective of Hanover. I may have executed this poorly, but my intention was to add a bit of depth to the conversation, seeing as the 3D aspect of the holotransmission system makes the calls all but in-the-flesh. Any suggestions on how to refine that idea are welcome.
How could the man sense the deliberation?
I guess it didn't pass as well as I thought it would, but the G-man sees Hanover "staring intently at the floor." The rest I wanted to leave up to the imagination.
Why would anyone want to cut a thick air of deliberation with a knife? That phrase is also somewhat cliche, it's typically best to avoid both cliches and adverbs, and use both sparingly.
The G-man doesn't
want to, he just feels as if he could. And yeah, it is a cliche, but I'm not really above using those where they fit my purpose. In this case, the G-man is just an old-fashioned sort of guy. I can't really say more than that without revealing more about his character than might be inferred, though.
Sixthly, why on earth did the Coalition man wait for Hanover to hem and haw before telling him that he has no choice in the matter? Don't add something like that in for the sole purpose of adding some sort of false drama, it usually doesn't work.
I wasn't really thinking about adding drama when I wrote that. He's not waiting very long, as the entire chapter represents only about ten or fifteen minutes of elapsed time. And the Coalition isn't some evil or even particularly devious entity, either -- they'd much rather try to gain as much ground as they can with Hanover before carting him off than resorting to outright kidnapping, however dire their confidential situation may be.
The first chapter should begin to create a complex world that the reader can really sink into.
To address this, your third point, and the general lack of description, it's part of the style that I'm trying to develop for writing both this particular short and short stories in general. It's my opinion that you can't really have a lot of background information in short fiction before the story gets in over its own head, so to speak. The hows and whys I'm deliberately avoiding in favor of a fast-paced narrative, especially in this opening chapter. I don't really think I've gotten too minimalist with it, but then my opinion is rather biased.
Hopefully a lot of this will be cleared up properly in-story once there's more context to be had, but if not, that's why I'm posting here in the first place :b