Armor Games has seen its fair share of writing contests. Tellingly, only the poetry has really caught on -- all prose contests tend to fall through within the first round. Perhaps more tellingly, the haiku contest is the only contest that's particularly active and receives broad participation. This is because the haiku is so constrained and short that people can get away with hackish excuses for poetry by merely stringing a few sentence fragments together with a vague nod to poetic form, giving the work the title "oetry" without giving the poet any need to worry about minor details like "rhyme" or "meter" or "meaning".
However, pretentious merit factory that it is, the haiku contest is successful because it appeals to our desire to do something artistic without actually putting any work into it. Constrained writing is good for that. Now, while I clearly have some issues with how constrained writing manifests itself sometimes, I do think it's really cool in principle. It's cool to see how a ridged form can mean so many different things to different people, and it does give a good metric for judging.
I, personally, never had much of a taste for Facebook statuses or tweets: as you can see, I much prefer to ramble. However, I am charmed by the ridiculously tiny character count. It's a beautiful thing when someone uses so few words to make meaning. And besides, this is the Internet, so what could be more fitting? If our attention span can't handle a short story contest (I know mine can't), then perhaps this is the prose contest AG needs.
So here's the idea: I'll be running a Twiction contest.Twiction is a genre of microfiction that asks the author to compose a work of prose that is exactly 140 characters long, inspired by the character limit of a tweet (hence the name).
So, without further inflammatory ramblings, here are the rules: 1. All entries must be 140 characters in length. No more, no less. Entries not meeting this standard are automatically disqualified. If no one meets the standard, no one wins. Titles and/or author attribution will be counted towards this total. 2. Any characters count. Punctuation marks are characters. Spaces are characters. Newlines are characters. Tabs* are characters. 3. This is a prose contest. Do not submit a poem. Feel free to make use of meter and rhyme if you want, as you would in prose, but entries will be judged to the standards of prose microfiction.
*Subrule that hardly matters: What? Tabs? AG doesn't support tab characters, I don't think, but I will. Five consecutive spaces will be counted as a single character. This will probably be a pointless rule, because I don't see anyone having such a dire need to indent, but here you go. Note that this only applies to five consecutive spaces, not spaces broken up by any other characters, and not newlines. Just spaces. Furthermore, it's worth noting that five spaces will always count as a single character: it will not be counted as five, even if that would be more convenient.
Now, basic judging standards: 1. Overall quality of work. Good writing is important. Good ideas are important. This contest asks the writer to create something with a meaningful impact on the reader in very few characters. 2. Spelling and grammar. Because of the character limit, this standard will be used to discourage weaseling one's way around the limit by omitting or adding characters in defiance of English spelling and grammar. Not all entries need perfect grammar and spelling, of course, but it helps. If you deliberately choose to violate grammar/spelling rules, do so because it helps the story make meaning, not to fit within the character limit. 3. There will be a theme I guess maybe. Themes help people write these things, I think. I just always worry that people will adhere to them far too closely, which is often the case in other contests. If the theme is "freedom", you don't need to write about people seeking freedom, or enjoying freedom, or an essay on the nature of freedom. The only requirement is that you write something esoterically related to the vague concept of freedom.
And... I think that's it. So there you have it: Twiction contest. First entries due a week from today at midnight AG time (that is, Monday, May 28th). This week's theme is the Internet. I guess. If y'all are into themes. Seemed fitting, given the inspiration of the contest.
I'll be judging the first round. While I'm clearly not qualified to offer a merit as a prize, the winner will receive a merit if there is enough interest.
This is because the haiku is so constrained and short that people can get away with hackish excuses for poetry by merely stringing a few sentence fragments together with a vague nod to poetic form, giving the work the title "oetry" without giving the poet any need to worry about minor details like "rhyme" or "meter" or "meaning".
*stares*
My entry:
Like a trap in imagination, lives a land of great wonder and porn. The porn to be excessive and pointless to the sheer fact of what the internet was not intended for. Amen.
Like a trap in imagination, lives a land of great wonder and porn. The porn to be excessive and pointless to the sheer fact of what the internet was not intended for. Amen.
I had to laugh when I read this. If it wasn't intended to be funny, oh well...
I'd like to participate here too. But not to write stories, mind you.
We can at least run it through a beta a couple of times to tweak it a bit if there are desires to.
I hate the 140 character rule.
Come on guys. 140 characters is the definition of twiction. And I want it to be more constrained than just "microfiction", because then no one will participate.
Still, if we receive significant disinterest, I may grudgingly raise the character count to 255.
Come on guys. 140 characters is the definition of twiction. And I want it to be more constrained than just "microfiction", because then no one will participate.
I understand the whole tweet concept, but can you ATLEAST give us some sort of pillow to fall on? Maybe... 130-150? Doing 140 EXACTLY plus a good quality writing piece is very hard.
Still, if we receive significant disinterest, I may grudgingly raise the character count to 255.
I'm not worried about it being too little, I am just, as Acmed, a little annoyed by having to reach 140 precisely. I don't want more words, I would just appreciate that I could write something 139 characters long and not be disqualified for not filling in with a comma or something. After all, aren't the definition "a story that can fit into a tweet" rather than "a textual nightmare"? At least if you are trying to make something short and compelling like the haikus.
(more so because the English comma rules a complete mystery to me... I don't grammar well either)
At 139 characters: Reaching out, but no one does a thing. They donât want to be cheated by yet another troll. No investments in feelings. But please. Help me.
Now feast your eyes as millions view your embarrassments--while biting the thumb--to add insult to injury; you only have yourself to blame.
There Xzeno, I've submitted the entry, 140 character just as Character Count says! Now please, don't send your men after me and turn me into a Freakenstool like your men said they would!
I'm glad we have some entries, at least. Honestly, I am not sure why 140 characters seems so difficult. I find that it's not too hard to trim twiction down (I always write too much at first) and then do a few minor tweaks until it's the right number. This does mean you might have to do some *gasp* editing, which I know is intolerable and defeats the point of receiving artistic praise without any effort, but come on. These STILL won't take you a hot ten minutes.
Anyway, acmed, I count 172 characters, which is 32 too many. Cenere, as you know, you're one character off. If I didn't know any better, I'd say you did that on purpose to make a point. Regardless, you could edit your entry and resubmit if you are interested in qualifying. I like what you have so far. Frank and Poison, both of your entries fit the requirements.
If people are really into having a range instead of 140 exactly, it is certainly worth consideration. I don't think it's an unreasonable suggestion. But I don't think it would be fair to change the rules in the middle of a round. So rule changes will be discussed more in depth and possibly implemented after the first round.
