Just once wouldn't you love for someone to simply show you the evidence for God's existence? No arm-twisting. No statements of, "You just have to believe."
Thanks, but since it is about faith, it has to come from himself, or else I can't trust it; like you said, many things can be rationally explained. I can't possibly believe with a transmitter in between can I? God is supposed to be omnipresent, if he doesn't make a step actively I still should feel his presence. Well I don't.
Before you look at the facts surrounding God's existence, ask yourself, If God does exist, would I want to know him?
Why yes, certainly.. may I add that I didn't care for any facts when I tried to call on him, in fact I believe it only is supposed to work when you set all facts apart.
1. Everything that is mentioned under '1' is not an argument for design. It hasn't been made to suit us, we are the ones who survived the conditions leading us to where we are now. Look at it from the other way round, and the design argument looks silly.
May I add that instead, if it was design it would be pretty unintelligent design? Just to name one big fail: our brain and heart lacks of functional anastomoses, linkings between bigger blood vessels; pretty much the rest of the body has some. They assure that if one vessel is blocked, the blood can still circulate and go to every cell. Since we don't have them in the heart or the brain, we are ridiculously prone to infarcts and apoplexy.
2.
The universe has not always existed. It had a start...what caused that? Scientists have no explanation for the sudden explosion of light and matter.
We can assume there was alreday something before the big bang, but that the universe
like we know it now has it's brth in the big bang (which, btw, is not an explosion but an expansion.)
The points under 3. ... basically what they are saying is, "We don't have a clue, therefore god did it." That's ridiculous. Everything influences everything, particles interact which is how the universe works. We haven't found out every single details up to now, doesn't mean we won't sometime. The fact we don't know something simply means we haven't found out by now, doesn't mean there is no reason behind it.
Not convincing.
4.
.. is a fail. We understand how that works actually. Plus, it's not like there was *poof* an organism with DNA in each cell. The very presence of DNA in each cell, it's information storage and it's capability of duplication is the reason why there are multicellular organisms. I beg you to read something about abiogenesis and about genetics.
5. Well, that's his personal interpretation. I simply want to find out how the world works, if there was a god I'd be glad to be enlightened and shown the truth, but during his absence I find the results of science very convincing, the way how it combines the facts is logic. I don't specifically want to convince believers of god's nonexistence, but I show them facts when they are wrong.
It's basically called education, and we don't need to plant a god behind all of this for it to make sense. In my opinion of course.
6.
So the narcissists are right and the objective people are not?
That's not a real argument sorry. Also, scriptures don't have to be right. I don't care for what jesus might have done 2000 years ago; I just want to know if he exists now, if he cares now. Old stories are old^^
All in all, this guy has been trying to prove religion by logical thinking, which, sorry to say, doesn't work. Religion is about faith, blind faith, and creationism is the biggest joke in existence.
But hey, thanks for the read, I know it isn't your arguments and it was entertaining to read all of those.. again.
I just don't see what this has to do with my case?