ForumsWEPRTheism and Atheism

4668 1487608
thepyro222
offline
thepyro222
2,150 posts
Peasant

I grew up atheist for 16 years. I had always kept an open mind towards religion, but never really felt a need to believe in it. My sister started going to a Wednesday night children's program at a church. Eventually, I was dragged into a Christmas Eve service. Scoffing, I reluctantly went, assuming that this was going to be a load of crap, but when I went, I felt something. Something that I've never felt before. I felt a sense of empowerment and a sense of calling. Jesus called upon my soul, just like he did with his disciples. he wanted me to follow him. Now, my life is being lived for Christ. He died on the cross for my sins, and the sins of everyone who believes in him. He was beaten, brutalized, struck with a whip 39 times, made to carry a cross up to the stage of his death. This I believe to be true, and I can never repay him for what he has done.
I still have my struggles with Christianity, but I've found this bit of information most useful. Religion is not comprehensible in the human mind, because we cannot comprehend the idea of a perfect and supreme being, a God, but we can believe it in our heart, and that's the idea of faith. Faith is, even though everything rides against me believing in Jesus, I still believe in him because I know that it's true in my heart. I invite my fellow Brothers and sisters of the LORD to talk about how Jesus has helped you in your life. No atheists and no insults please

  • 4,668 Replies
pballaddict
offline
pballaddict
128 posts
Nomad

Dair5 are you an atheist too?

Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

Honestly, I think MageGrayWolf needs to be quiet about evolution. Because Charles Darwin, the one who practically started plenty of this evolution stuff, was a Christian.


Fallacy of ad hominem, pballaddict. Just because Charles Darwin was a confirmed Christian does not mean that any of his findings are not of sound merit.
dair5
offline
dair5
3,371 posts
Shepherd

Wait, that was what he was implying? Oh. Well then I agree, a christian can be a good scientist.

xSnakeEaterx
offline
xSnakeEaterx
10 posts
Nomad

It is not right for anyone to be putting up comments on how his belief is stupid and that yours is better! All beliefs have something stupid and/or wronge with them like how Atheism is allways trying to prove that religion is wronge instead of proveing that Atheism is right, or how Religions are allways trying to tell you that your way is wronge and that their way is the onley way. My point is dont try to disrespect someone elses belief just becouse you think its wronge

dair5
offline
dair5
3,371 posts
Shepherd

Actually I am also christian, and was just saying that christians can also be scientists. And atheism isn't really a group, every atheist has there own belifes besides lack of belife in a deity. I apolgize if I came across as disrespectful through, I do respect peoples belifes.

MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

Honestly, I think MageGrayWolf needs to be quiet about evolution. Because Charles Darwin, the one who practically started plenty of this evolution stuff, was a Christian. So honestly, I dont think the topic of evolution should be brought up when trying to disprove Christianity. But hey, that's just me.


What Charles Darwin did was discover the mechanism by which evolution works.
vesperbot
offline
vesperbot
955 posts
Nomad

But GOD controls everything. NOTHING happens that doesn't go according to his will, so everything that happens IS his will, including those who burn in Hell.
We are given the ability to act against God's will, as an effect of free will. So my dear, if YOUR will is to burn in Hell, God will do you that. God can persuade you out of that, but He rarely does such feats directly, mostly He uses us your neighbors to help you.
See, this is my point. If God revealed himself and said "If you don't worship me, you will burn in Hell" THEN we would be choosing between heaven and hell.
He did, go read Gospels.
But for not believing he exists, there's no reason to send me to Hell, because I wouldn't continue to doubt his existence if I was in heaven.
If you are too stubborn to not accept the truth if it's up front against, you, you will ultimately reject God and He will leave you alone, as good as in Hell. If you will accept Him as your God, it's better, but then your other deeds will come into account, by those deeds one can separate himself from God. Mt 25:31-46 give some details of what can one do to serve God in people, and it seems to be required.
God allows Lucifer to play this game, and God is all-powerful, therefore more powerful than Lucifer, therefore the game goes on by his own will, therefore he is ultimately responsible for it.
Hmm. Had to think that through to get a formidable answer. The answer is yes, God is responsible for many actions. But since some actions are effects of our choices, we are responsible for what we alter. Every right has a responsibility attached to it. So, if you have the right to believe or not, you are responsible for your choice, the same with many other available choices a person makes in his life. This means you cannot place the entirety of responsibility to God, because you are responsible for what you do. Anyway, even while God is responsible, He has no one to answer to, otherwise He won't be God. So you also cannot demand God of why He allowed something to happen. There was at least one parable regarding this matter...

One old man was constantly speaking "The world is unjust". An angel descends to him and told "You asked God of why the world is unjust. Come with me and I'll show you something." They come to a well where a big tree stood, with a hollow in it, the angel told the old man to climb into the hollow and watch, but not express his presence, and then vanished. Shortly a rich man came, settled to eat some meat and other tasty dishes, and fiddled with a purse full of gold, but when he left, he forgot the purse under the tree. Another man came, dressed poorly but cleanly, ate some bread with water from the well, then noticed the purse, grabbed it and returned home. Shortly a beggar came, dressed in rags, to drink some water, but as he approached, the rich man returned and demanded his purse off the beggar. Failing to get it back, he hit the beggar and killed him, and left in shock of what he just did. The old man cried within the tree, but at that moment the angel returned, and asked what did he see here. The old man replied "Injustice only", and then the angel told him: "That poor man was once a friend of that rich man, but the rich man robbed him blind of all his riches, and that beggar was once rich as well, but he turned up on his brother to get his riches, and killed him, but repented and gave away all his riches and requested God for a similar death to amend his guilt. God adhered to his prayers and gave him the martyrdom." The awestruck old man said "God is just."
Then doubt the Bible. Doubt God's existence. You don't have to deny it. I'm not denying it either.
There's a set of axioms in science as well. Here, the Bible is an axiom. Its interpretations, however, are not axioms and can be doubted, but it's complicated enough, so we have theologians for these debates, as you have scientists.
3: If you do not believe, your soul shall perish in a lake of fire.
Sorry Shift, this is not exactly like this. It's more like "If you refuse to believe, then..." There are still people who have never heard about God, but live according to their own conscience, and they can still be saved by the grace of God whom they couldn't just meet without their own guilt.
The end justifies, the means, eh Razinskie?
It's not a good deed for a moderator to pervert words. I don't tolerate trolling authorities.
All our perceived senses belong in our brain, not our supposed "soul".
Can you sense love with your brain?
No one knows what God looks like, so the whole thing is shoddy on both sides of the argument.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veil_of_Veronica
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin
Honestly, I think MageGrayWolf needs to be quiet about evolution. Because Charles Darwin, the one who practically started plenty of this evolution stuff, was a Christian. So honestly, I dont think the topic of evolution should be brought up when trying to disprove Christianity. But hey, that's just me.
He's just trying to convince Shift4101 to accept evolution as true, which he refuses constantly. I have tried to make him do that too, since the Church has managed to resolve the contradictions arisen from literal reading of the Bible and evolution as a well-supported theory. I personally think that evolution is a proven theory, which however does not mitigate religion.
Fallacy of ad hominem, pballaddict. Just because Charles Darwin was a confirmed Christian does not mean that any of his findings are not of sound merit.
Misinterpretation does not do you any good too Freakenstein.
grimml
offline
grimml
879 posts
Nomad

Atheism is allways trying to prove that religion is wronge

(Many) Buddhists are Atheists. Last time I checked Buddhism was a religion...

instead of proveing that Atheism is right

Atheism = Lack of believe in gods
There's nothing to proof here. Do we have any proof that gods exists? No? Do we need gods to explain the world? No? Well then it seems logical to me not to believe in any god.

Actually I am also christian, and was just saying that christians can also be scientists. And atheism isn't really a group, every atheist has there own belifes besides lack of belife in a deity. I apolgize if I came across as disrespectful through, I do respect peoples belifes.

Thank you dair5!

He did, go read Gospels.

Go read the Quran or another holy book. They say that you will burn in hell...

There's a set of axioms in science as well. Here, the Bible is an axiom.

But the Bible contradicts itself several times. Using the bible as an axiom doesn't seem to be a good idea...
Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

several times


Several? That's funny.

He did, go read Gospels.


Which would be great...if we could take the bible as a source or truth, but, as has been gone over in this thread how many times I do not know, it's not valid as one.
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

Here, the Bible is an axiom.


The Bible is far from being logical being full of contradictory information, magic and metaphor. So we can't take it as self evident. Because of these things it's also a poor basis to work on as a deduction.

Can you sense love with your brain?


Yes...
Highfire
offline
Highfire
3,025 posts
Nomad

like how Atheism is allways trying to prove that religion is wronge instead of proveing that Atheism is right

Atheism is the lack of belief in a deity - to put it loosely. Don't generalize.

Also, Atheism is often falsifiable, the Big Bang, Evolution, all related to Atheism (given how they can directly contradict religious POV's), the main debate I think we (as Atheists) on this thread throw out is that Atheism is more logical.

My point is dont try to disrespect someone elses belief just becouse you think its wronge

I disrespect religion for what its followers have done and caused, not because it's wrong. If it said there is a God that spits out yellow stars that Mario can get to use God Mode, and didn't try spreading it everywhere or effecting others because of it, I wouldn't mind. If someone believes that killing others in the name of your God is the right idea, then hell no.

I do respect peoples belifes.

It's difficult to decipher believer to belief, but this is the same case for me - I respect their beliefs, I generally disrespect the belief itself (however as I've said some followers are not respectable in my eyes).

Also, this thread constantly evolves, it's strange. O.o

- H
partydevil
offline
partydevil
5,129 posts
Jester

you are right that i dont want to accept evolution


ignorand fool.
vesperbot
offline
vesperbot
955 posts
Nomad

Can you sense love with your brain?

Yes...
How?
But the Bible contradicts itself several times. Using the bible as an axiom doesn't seem to be a good idea...
The Bible is the closest source to God's words there exists, so taking them as an axiom is fine while we can resolve or ignore the human-made contradictions (like say wrong numbers of Jews somewhere, like you showed me once already). In case of God's words coming into contradictions, I'd rather have you show me the place where, and the contradiction should not be based on perverting the words and meanings. One of those linked here was "It is ok to test (tempt) God?" with the phrases under "Yes" be prayers of request, while tempting God is demanding.

And people, any argument against the remainder of my post? Or is it all true and unable to be argued?
partydevil
offline
partydevil
5,129 posts
Jester

In case of God's words coming into contradictions, I'd rather have you show me


the bible was written by a human, so there actualy are no words from god in it.

(dunno what you wrote befor. so i can't comment on that)
Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

How?


How do you breathe? How do you move your arm? Derp.

And people, any argument against the remainder of my post? Or is it all true and unable to be argued?


You're just stating an opinion. For every other religion, their holy text is as close to the word of God as it comes. For the interpretations, well, the 40,000 variations of Christianity speak for themselves. We could argue with you indivdually, but you just read into it what you want and we do the same.
Showing 2566-2580 of 4668